Post a Comment
Make no mistake - I wanted to believe freespire was going to be 'linspire doing the right thing' but all I can say now is 'same old, same old'!
I think freespire was the one final chance at being something other than a company and I am truly disappointed that they blew it. (in my book at least)
"Make no mistake - I wanted to believe freespire was going to be 'linspire doing the right thing' but all I can say now is 'same old, same old'!"
You're full of it mate. You take a pop at Linspire/Freespire every change you get.
You submitted this and I bet you were rubbing your hands in glee at yet another opportunity to be the sour grape in the bunch.
So what. The distowatch rankings are a scam anyways. There are so many things wrong with their method of gathering information that any statistics that they derive from the data is worthless. If you want an example of how worthless it is check out where Redhat is on distowatch. Comin' in at 29, right behind Nexenta and Frugalware. 'Cause we all know that no one uses Redhat. It is not even in the top ten amongst Linux distributions.
If you really want to see what Linux distributions are popular it would be better to check out Alexa or Google Trends.
Edited 2006-09-05 21:00
Bingo
Even Ladislav of Distrowatch says emphatically to not put any stock in their hit rankings.
But yet we have this big to-do about the ethics of Freespire's linking into their page on Distrowatch.
<sarcasm>
STOP THE PRESSES!!!! FREESPIRE IS BALLOT STUFFING!!! SHAME ON THEIR LACK OF ETHICS!!!! ARRRRRGGHHHH!!! LINSPIRE IS EVIL!!!
</sarcasm>
C'mon. Let's have a more important argument, like, say, the names of Snow White's seven dwarves, or the color of Tiger Woods' shirt during the PGA, or something.
No originally he claimed complete ignorance and until all the others were pointed out...well he let the mob attack and poke fun so he could come in with his smoke and mirrors and clear it all up.
I mean come on.... the LINSPIRE PROUD LEAD SPONSOR button on the NVU website goes to distrowatch?
Edited 2006-09-04 18:43
Yeah, because if they *had* been intentionally trying to stuff the ballot, Kevin Carmony would of course be disinterested and impartial enough to cheerfully admit this fact. The fact that he instead says it was some kind of honest mistake on the part of a nameless, faceless employee proves beyond doubt that it wasn't an attempt to stuff the ballot.
Not sure I'm in a position to judge whether Freespire is actually the bad guy here, or if it's just something silly. But I really wonder what is so extraordinary about the DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking?
I admit, I visit DW regularly to see if there's some news about some distros I had left, like Suse or Ubuntu, and I enjoyed the podcast Weekly (the Milo version at least).
But frankly I couldn't care less about the "page hit ranking". I always had the impression that this meant a lot of curious Linux newcomers were redirected by some people to DW, and as they had only heard of Ubuntu before anyway because of the free shipit disks, they'd check out Ubuntu.
And some year ago, when I saw that Mepis was somewhere in the top-5 I thought, what on earth is Mepis ? I remember thinking they, or their fans, had probably messed around with it.
But if your business has confidence in something as manipulable as a page hit ranking, something's wrong with you.
And let's not forget, mr. DistroWatch himself has always said that the Page Hit Ranking is nothing to base anything on.
Might be time to get rid of it.
This is not something to be proud of, in any case. People already make fun of Linux distroitis.
Well, it's rather like when a dictator fixes an election. (Not that I'm comparing distrowatch to a dictator, by the way.) Nobody really trusts the results of an election run by a dictator, but when the dictator wins 95 or 97% of the vote, it's taken as an indication of (a) how far the dictator is willing to go to "prove himself"; and (b) how far out of touch he is that he can quite happily quote himself as having 95% of the vote. I don't know about you, but I'm sceptical of ever being able to get 95% of any group anywhere to agree on [i]anything.
...First Steve Irwin dies
Completely off-topic, but with my blessing: yes, indeed, that was damn horrible news this morning
. I'm a huge fan of Steve Irwin. I wrote about it on my blog:
http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2006/09/04/381/
"is weird how that link could have gotten there"
not one link!
one default home page of the browser on new installs
a link from the linspire website
a button and a link from the NVU website
a couple other links
The links were not just a "click here to go to distrowatch and throw us a bone" but where instead deceiving links that stated GET FRESPIRE or LINSPIRE - PROUD LEAD SPONSOR and so forth...
Edited 2006-09-04 19:15
Some express URL's were in fact pointing people to the Freespire's DistroWatch page. As soon as this was discovered, by the Freespire community itself, it was changed. There was no outside pressure brought to bear, the community fixed this problem in less than 24 hours of it being discovered.
Ladislav (owner of DistroWatch) said this is a very common thing, and has been done by pretty much every Linux community at one time or another. However, in over Five years Linspire has NEVER been involved with or accused of something like this. (Which is pretty apparent, because Linspire has always been very low on the DistroWatch charts. =) When it happened this one time with Freespire project, the links were immediately removed.
It couldn't have had too drastic of an impact, Freespire is still #32 on the DistroWatch homepage chart. This is a good example how an open source community policies its own behavior.
Kevin Carmony
CEO, Linspire, Inc.
Edited 2006-09-04 19:13
"However, in over Five years Linspire has NEVER been involved with or accused of something like this. (Which is pretty apparent, because Linspire has always been very low on the DistroWatch charts. =) When it happened this one time with Freespire project, the links were immediately removed. "
So it's only wrong if you get caught?
FTA:Several readers have emailed us to let us know that Linspire has launched what can only be classified as an attempt to tamper with our page hit ranking statistics by trying to artificially inflate the page hit ranking figures for its new community distribution - Freespire.
"Several readers" Obviously you didn't RTFA either.
Edited 2006-09-04 19:29
Mr Carmony,
Whether or not someone else does it is completely irrelevant to the issue. Basically everybody does some speeding in his life (and in Europe, it's more of a rule than an exception, actually), but that does not actually make it right. I speed a lot too (I like things that go fast), but you will not hear me complain when in an honest way, I get caught. I sure as hell will not try to cover my behind by saying, "oh who cares, everybody does it, so it really is not wrong". Because it is.
Now, Like I said in a previous comment, I really don't care about this at all-- Heck, even if Freespire hacked the Distrowatch page and put Freespire atop the rankings, I still would not give a damn. Even though I'm not a user of Lin/Freespire, I find it a very solid, well-built distribution (I reviewed 5.0 at my previous employer, a copy supplied by your press dpt.), and this issue won't change a bit about that. I try to seperate people/companies from products (just like the fact that many celebreties are idiots does not make their films/albums/etc. any worse), because I have to deal with not the people/companies, but the products they make.
However, that does not negate the fact that this thing happened, and since you guys are 'teh 3vil' to many anyway, it is just plain STUPID. No, worse-- it is MORONIC, at the same time being outragiously hilarious-- no offence.
The reason I, as editor, decided to publish a link to this on OSNews, is that many people DO care about the companies making the products they are using. I belong to a minority; the majority of our readership cares about the companies/people behind their products; hence I want to inform them of any good/bad things those companies/people do.
In short, the fact you addmited the error is great, and I applaud that; however, do not try to lessen the 'offence' by pointing fingers. It just isn't very posh.
EDIT: typo fixes.
Edited 2006-09-04 19:49
Get a f*ing grip already! What is it about *spire that makes people react like this?
So the fact that other distros have "cheated" too does not excuse Freespire. Alright. Then why has Freespire been singled out in this case? Why not critizise all the distros that have cheated?
BTW, i am using Ubuntu right now, but i am tempted to switch to Freespire just to spite all you hypocrites!
The issue is one thing. The means to which they are willing to go to get a high ranking on a site they have dismissed as being pointless and worthless is a statement of character that speaks volumes.
They have done this with other things too. A reviewer has negative things to say, he becomes a 'ubuntu fan boy' or a 'paid stooge' or 'obviously bias' but when that reviewer later has good things to say he is all of a sudden offering a 'fair review' and is 'obviously a astute individual' and 'writing fairly and unbiased'! Too Funny!
Sit and read the linspire forums for a while. Participate in the group for a while. Go ahead. See for yourself.
The president of the company trying to use smoke and mirrors to say that it would not affect the outcome is another issue. He had to just be blowing smoke and counting on everyone being ignorant to how a website works. He also claims it was just a slip up when later it was shown that there is no way any of that could be a slip up. As was pointed out in another thread, if the president is that clueless to what is going on in the company are you sure you want to use that product? Are you sure you trust anything from them?
One of the worst was the manner it was handled. No mistake is owned up to, only excuses made and other things pointed out like how everyone else does it or it doesn't make a difference.
The users will continue to swear it was all unintentional and it is just us mean trolls bashing them and their distro because it is better than everyone elses especially ubuntu.
Everyone hates linspire for no reason, they haven't done anything. Nothing like this, nothing like that atkins diet novell stuff, nothing like saying that ubuntu must pay people to spread ubuntu and so forth.
In all honesty, I can't say I am angry with whoever is responsible for this. This sort of thing happens all the time...
From post by Ladislav, owner of DistroWatch.
http://forum.freespire.org/showpost.php?p=14383&postcount=53
That doesn't make it right, but it doesn't make Linspire/Freespire as evil as some love making us out to be.
Kevin
Now now.... is that ALL he said? You should know I would post the rest as well.
Here are my favorite parts of that SAME POST as well
"Somebody at Linspire decided to sent some traffic to DistroWatch (which was a very noble idea), probably in order to drive Freespire up the page hit ranking stats (which was _not_ a very noble idea),"
"Kevin is also wrong in assuming that these are all innocent re-directions that have nothing to do with the page hit statistics on DistroWatch. As a matter of fact, each hit from a unique IP address is recorded as a hit, irrespective of the referrer (unless there is no referrer, in which case the hit is not counted - this is to make sure that no hits are generated by those who set up their home pages to one of the distribution pages on DistroWatch). So while setting up the default home page on Freespire to DistroWatch had no effect on the counter, linking to DistroWatch from linspire.com and nvu.com did increase the page hits considerably"
"The current Freespire issue looks to me as an obvious attempt to manipulate the DistroWatch page hit ranking. Several people have confirmed that the default home page on the most recent build of Freespire goes to the Freespire page on DistroWatch. The front page of Linspire.com links to the same page with a "Get Freespire Now" graphic (even as I write this, despite Kevin's assurances above that this has been rectified) - a rather deceiving redirection. There is a similarly deceiving graphic on nvu.com. I might be wrong, but the above suggests that this is hardly a mistake, but rather a concerted effort to increase the Freespire page hit ranking on DistroWatch.
smooooke and mirrrors....
Please take the cheesy cliche's and smart ass comments back to your own forums. I for one am a bit disgusted by the fact that the freaking ceo of Linspire still does not fully grasp that this is not a joke, but a serious breech of ethics.
Nevermind, I forgot you guys don't know anything about ethics. You ARE the ceo of the same company that took Mozilla Composer, rebadged it as NVU and then pretended like you built it completely from scratch. Yes, the last comment was completely off-topic but if you're going to come over here and act stupid by sticking your ass into the fire with no credible comments, you might as well get burned.
RE[4]: Post from Ladislav of DistroWatch
I think it only fair that we also point out that this "story" was submitted by Deanlinkous. Those on the Freespire forums know him well, and quickly fixing the problem isn't enough for him, he seems to want to make sure and pound Freespire into the ground any chance he gets.
He has every right to say anything he wishes, but it's only fair that those on this site know it's quite apparent to the Freespire community that this is someone with a serious ax to grind.
Microsoft loves this drama among Linux and open source.
Kevin
Yes that word is a favorite of them also. Anyone that doesn't have blue/green flags are trolls.
Anyone that knows me also knows that I gave a fair shot at freespire and spread the word that CNR was free and a step in the right direction and one I hoped would continue. I truly meant that! You blew it not me! Go ahead shovel all the blame over to me....oh it is all that deanlinkous doing, that evil troll making us look bad. No dude YOU made yourself loook bad nobody else!
Edited 2006-09-04 19:37
i say to you...
who cares!
i for one do not. obviously it had zero effect on the distrowatch rankings (which mean squat to me). I use several distros (freespire is one of them). this kind of thing (the way the community reacts to insignificant things) makes me want to quit using linux all together( been using it since 1996 or so). from the outside looking in. It appears to non linux users we are always in-fighting amongst ourselves. It would appear that we do nothing but compete with one another on which is better (a my dad can beat up your dad kidna deal). We have elitist attitudes about how this is so much better than that. If i were curious about linux and i cam across this silly stuff on a Operating system news site I would run the other way fast. IMHO we should spend more time working to improve Open Source software and our distros of choice rather than flame about on insignificant matters. The bottom line is: What effect did this actually have on the rankings ? If it would have spiked to #1: what effect would that have had ?
Im sure that if you are a veteran Linux user you know that you do not pay attention to the rankings on distrowatch. The information on distrowatch that is the most valuable are the reviews and news not the rankings. I for one vote they be removed. Im not siding with either side... i think that if it wasnt an oversight that a public apology should be issued by the one who put the link there, and i think also that the ones that are griping and moaning over such a trivial thing should actually do something to contribute to a project or to their distro instead of wasting valuable news space and time with such a silly complaint. After all im sure that several distros point browsers to various pages on the net for various reasons. I assume that no one faults firefox for having their own google landing page (which im sure can generate ad sense revenue at your expense).
keep in mind i am not just a freespire supporter... I support several projects.. i use several distros... i contribute cash/code/resources and positive helpful discussion when i can. what do you contribute besides projecting a bad impression of Linux to the public ? (not just freespire... since this reflects not only on Freespire but also it reflects on Linux for those who are potentially thinking of switching)
btw:
did i ever say anything about an elitist snob being upset because Freespire/Linspire is trying to make Linux easy to use ?
Perhaps i have... please refresh my memory
Edited 2006-09-04 19:43
Yeah, the Linux community coming down on someone for possibly being overzealous. Now we've heard it all.
Since the general feel of the Linux posters here is the Linspire/Freespire is a Bad Thing; that must mean they are doing something right.
The stallmanites that infest the OSNews boards also hold OS X and BeOS in great contempt and I personally think both are fantastic and both are ahead of Linux in MANY aspects. This tells me Linspire may actually be worth looking into. Linux user around these parts tend to feel threatened when a perceived competitor shows superiority in some/any aspect over their distro-of-choice.
Edited 2006-09-04 19:45
Yeah, the Linux community coming down on someone for possibly being overzealous. Now we've heard it all.
You speak as if "the Linux community" were made up of clones. It's not.
Since the general feel of the Linux posters here is the Linspire/Freespire is a Bad Thing; that must mean they are doing something right.
Umm, no. A lot of Linux users might not like Linspire because they feel their distribution is trying to be something Linux isn't, and/or because it includes proprietary software, but that is WAY different from disagreeing with ballot stuffing. If that's "doing something right," which dictator is YOUR hero?
The stallmanites that infest the OSNews boards also hold OS X and BeOS in great contempt
Am I a Stallmanite? Yes. Do I hold OS X OR BeOS in contempt? No.
and I personally think both are fantastic and both are ahead of Linux in MANY aspects This tells me Linspire may actually be worth looking into.
This tells us your reasoning is faulty.
Linux user around these parts tend to feel threatened when a perceived competitor shows superiority in some/any aspect over their distro-of-choice.
No, but we don't hesitate to call bullshit on posts such as this.
Yeah, I heard we're not supposed to excuse what's wrong, and O was Freespire naughty.
But it gets less entertaining when people start looking for vengeance like a bunch of hyenas.
I mean, Who Got Killed?
We are talking about a (so far) marginal Linux OS here.
Elsewhere, people are fighting over 911 conspiracies, people still get killed everyday in Iraq, Iran might be next, America's economy's might well be on the verge of collapse, Israel's been daisycutting all over the place in Lebanon, and Sudan is still worse than all that.
I'm so sorry for sliding off-topic. Now unless someone can point out where the victim is - I mean some of you guys give the impression that Freespire's killing off the GPL or something - give us a break.
In the Linspire forums thread they pretty much roasted deanlinkous, saying he was basically an outsider and his point didn't matter. The funny thing is, the Trol^H^H^HLinspire communtiy seems to have had no issue coming over here and signing up a bunch of accounts to continue the anti-anti-*spire party.
"kernelpanicked, are you really this much of an ass off the forums, or is a persona you put on to satisfy some need?"
Hey LinuxUser2006, take a breather bro OR sis.
This is just a minor disturbance in the vast expanse that is "Reality."
I personally just thought Kevins "microsoft statement" was pretty poor at best, thats why I responded.
All in all, I don't really care much, freespires image doesnt really matter to me that much, but they do seem to be getting pounded on quite a bit. And I can't say that all of it is unwarranted.
Edited because (bro/sis) is a me implying dual gender, that was not my intent. Bad, jdodson, bad
Ahh the joys of way too fast typing.
Edited 2006-09-04 22:42
"Microsoft loves this drama among Linux and open source"
The United States president says the same kind of thing when people get critical of the war in Iraq. Something about disagreement and discussion fueling terrorism, or some such. Some call people being critical of certain political stances un-patriotic.
Kevin, your statement was so poor, I literally shook my head in disbelief that you actually made it.
"jdodson,your statement was so poor, I literally shook my head in disbelief that you actually made it."
LOL.
Fair enough, its just how i saw it:)
All in a days work I guess.
I just meant that just because some might be a bit critical of Linspires recent activities does not mean they mean to fuel Microsofts position.
Not that Kevin was saying that perse, but I don't think people should really be too afraid of having a disagreement because Microsoft would possibly stand to benefit. Which I am not sure they would in this case anyway, this is a Freespire bad PR story. I fail to see how that effects the entire free software community or movement.
EDITed, i just couldnt resist.
Edited 2006-09-04 22:29
Looks like the lesson has not been learned
http://forum.freespire.org/showthread.php?t=1678
So what excuse do you have for this Kevin?
EDIT: BTW you guys should check the end of that thread again. They basically came ot the conclusion that anyone who drifts from the Kevin Carmont curcle jerk should get out, and then locked the thread.
Edited 2006-09-05 00:51
"EDIT: BTW you guys should check the end of that thread again. They basically came ot the conclusion that anyone who drifts from the Kevin Carmont curcle jerk should get out, and then locked the thread. "
As the one who locked said thread, I can say that your statement is the furthest thing from the truth. There was an issue brought up by a member of the forums, it was resolved in less than 24 hours (on a holiday weekend, no less) by the CEO of Linspire.... and that was that.
We are trying to build a friendly, helpful community at Freespire, and the thread was obviously degenerating to the point that the "dead horse" was beaten over and over again. There were NO more useful points or couterpoints given, since the "problem" was solved, so I locked the thread. If you don't like that... that's cool by me. I don't really care one way or the other what you think of me, but don't put words or actions about me from YOUR mouth, as you obviously don't know.
And yes... I registered here to be able to post, and this is my first post... I freely admit. However, no animals were hurt during the composition of this post... ;-)
Harvey
"As the one who locked said thread, I can say that your statement is the furthest thing from the truth. There was an issue brought up by a member of the forums, it was resolved in less than 24 hours (on a holiday weekend, no less) by the CEO of Linspire.... and that was that. "
You people keep saying the issue is a "dead horse". How is that remotely true when this is less than 24 hours old and, there still has not been a satisfactory response from kevin. "Everyone else does it" just won't cut it. I didn't put words in anyone's mouth. All one has to do to verify my previous comment is look at the thread themselves.
" How is that remotely true when this is less than 24 hours old and, there still has not been a satisfactory response from kevin."
That is YOUR opinion. Kevin had ALL the links changed when he found out about it... done deal, story finished... dead horse.
As I said, if YOU don't like it... that's cool by me. I'll loose a whole pico seconds worth of sleep over it tonight.
Harvey
I have never ever EVER posted a thread questioning the point of an article on OSN, realizing that in many cases it's simply different strokes for different folks, but seriously, WTF?
The thread was locked on the linspire forums and so now it's carrying over here?
This is such a non-issue. Even Moulineff's GPL / traitor rants are somewhat more insightful.
Disappointed. Mod me down if you must, but seriously, WTF?





